a.r.s., November 16, 1995
From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Karin Spaink)
Subject: Re: Your_Name@Dianetics.som
Date: Thur, 16 Nov 1995 00:11:38 GMT
email@example.com (RichieB) wrote:
> On 15 Nov 1995 11:51:03 GMT, Jet (firstname.lastname@example.org) wrote:
>> It is not the same, but very similar to the recent tactics used in Holland case,
>> where Karin Spaink, a freelance journalist conspiring with XS4ALL co-
>> founder,Phillip Rodriguez, sent out over 100 e-mail messages urging users
>> to unlawfully post some of the churches copyrighted materials, which she
>> persuaded some to do by promoting that XS4ALL would win any case brought
>> against them by the Church.
> I keep hearing about "over 100 email messages" and I'm wondering where the
> hell you would get that information, Jet.
I wonder too. I mean, I did sent out an e-mailed request that people look into the situation and asked them to consider joining the protest. And indeed I sent this message to over a hundred people - why would I deny that? Indeed, that message is now on my homepage, among a collection of messages I have posted to a.r.s.
But in as far as I know, that was perfectly legal and nothing similar to 'conspiring'. Funny thing is, Andrew Milne referred to that message before I put it on my homepage. I wonder where he got that information from?
Also, CoS Holland has a collection of e-mails I exchanged wih one of the other participants (Newkid) and with Felipe Rodriquez. But those messages have never been published. Yet CoS handed them over to a journalist, accusing me and Felipe of conspiracy, and making it appear as if Felipe and I were partipants in an alleged 'swindle'. You should have seen the press-bulletins CoS sent out yesterday.
CoS claims they got those e-mails from a 'female informer'. Neither Felipe nor I know who she is, but we have some suspicions. (See my posting about CoS's first serious effort at Dead Agenting.)
> Did OSA hire someone to crack Karin's account? Did someone read her
> email without her permission? If so, that would be illegal and your
> knowledge of it would make you an accessory to the crime.
I tend to believe that CoS gave somebody a lot of money to get somebody to comply and betray her friend. I am however not sure.
> Did someone in OSA just make it up? Is it a flat-out lie?
No - it's a complicated lie. Partly true, partly lie.
> Which is it, Jet? How do you know what's in Karin's outgoing email?
I wonder too. I might add that all journalists I have spoken with recognise this ploy as an effort at Dead Agenting, and that many newsgroup-readers in Holland are outraged at what has happened. They realise they are witnessing Dead Agenting in full swing. Judging by the reactions I received so far, it mainly serves to strengthen their dislike of CoS.
Copyright Karin Spaink.
This text is offered for personal use only. Any
other use requires the author's written permission.