From lurker@bmg.com Fri May  8 22:06:44 EDT 1998
Article: 138274 of alt.religion.scientology
Path: mistletoe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!honeysuckle.srv.cs.cmu.edu!bb3.andrew.cmu.edu!pitt.edu!newsfeed.sgi.net!nntp.abs.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!nyd.news.ans.net!newsjunkie.ans.net!newsfeeds.ans.net!bmgnews.bmgmusic.com!not-for-mail
From: SP 1 <lurker@bmg.com>
Newsgroups: alt.religion.scientology
Subject: Fair Use of NOTS34
Date: Fri, 08 May 1998 13:52:35 -0500
Organization: BMG Entertainment	
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <35535472.21E62B5D@bmg.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: gate.bmgmusic.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; SunOS 5.4 sun4m)
Xref: skinner.boltz.cs.cmu.edu alt.religion.scientology:138274

begin Fair Use extract:

                   _NED for OTs Series 34_
                  _C O N F I D E N T I A L_

       _THE SEQUENCE FOR HANDLING A PHYSICAL CONDITION_

 There is a definite sequence for handling a physical
condition. All steps must be done in this sequence to fully handle the
condition:

[snip]

_Step Three - Illness_

     The next action is to handle illnesses of the body part(i.e.
BTs and clusters being "sick lungs" or being a condition of an illness
or disease or the body part.) "Illness of body part" will cease to
read.

_Step Four - Cures for Illness_

     You will now find BTs and clusters being cures for illnesses
of the body part. Handle all such BTs and clusters by blowing them
off. "Cures for Illness" will then cease to read.



end FUe


This leads one to believe that the Co$ is attempting to practice
medicine (I know, I know, big suprise to the readers of this board).
While an adult can probably use the above "cure" and avoid FDA hassles
(freedom of religion), what about adults that try to use the above
"cure" on children?  The courts have repeatedly decided that children
are a special interest to the court and, as such, have taken special
measures to protect them.

BTW, I can't help commenting on the wrong usage of i.e. (id est) which
means "that is."  What should have been used was e.g., (for example).
That is a pet peeve of mine. (Not to mention the poor grammar, which is
an L. Ron Hubbard given.)


The above use of NOTS 34 is most definitely within the Fair Use clause
of the Copyright Law.  If you try to come after me, Ms. Korbin, I will
get you disbarred for filing frivilous lawsuits.


--

"Commodore" SP 1, and holding...